<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ActionScript 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zedii.co.uk/life/actionscript-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zedii.co.uk/life/actionscript-30/</link>
	<description>stuff about me, plus one, divide by two, multiplied by a thousand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zayd</title>
		<link>http://www.zedii.co.uk/life/actionscript-30/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Zayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zedii.co.uk/?p=225#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Yeah it pretty much is. AS2.0 felt a lot easier to write as there wasn&#039;t as many lines of code to write. However, it&#039;s not about how many lines you write when it comes to coding, it&#039;s the flexibilty over the code.

But as I&#039;ve read, they haven&#039;t totally ruled out AS2.0 because it is still widely used given that it&#039;s been the basis of Flash CS2 and any other version previous to that.

But, I&#039;m in it for the learning experience. AS2.0 is definitely worth learning. I think it is important to learn the transition between AS2.0 to AS3.0.

Most of my work will probably still be AS2.0 until I find the equivalents in AS3.0. For that, that&#039;s where the tutorial section will become handy for me, as well as those looking to see the transitions.

Check out the tutorials to see what I mean :).

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it pretty much is. AS2.0 felt a lot easier to write as there wasn&#8217;t as many lines of code to write. However, it&#8217;s not about how many lines you write when it comes to coding, it&#8217;s the flexibilty over the code.</p>
<p>But as I&#8217;ve read, they haven&#8217;t totally ruled out AS2.0 because it is still widely used given that it&#8217;s been the basis of Flash CS2 and any other version previous to that.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;m in it for the learning experience. AS2.0 is definitely worth learning. I think it is important to learn the transition between AS2.0 to AS3.0.</p>
<p>Most of my work will probably still be AS2.0 until I find the equivalents in AS3.0. For that, that&#8217;s where the tutorial section will become handy for me, as well as those looking to see the transitions.</p>
<p>Check out the tutorials to see what I mean :).</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredrik</title>
		<link>http://www.zedii.co.uk/life/actionscript-30/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zedii.co.uk/?p=225#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Is AS 3.0 a total rewrite of AS 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is AS 3.0 a total rewrite of AS 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

